Skip to content

The change is being valued at rates that don't fit

The variation is agreed, but they've priced it with rates that are nowhere near what the work actually involved.

01The change happens
02Put in writing
03Recorded as it runs
04Valued
05Applied and paid
You are here: The change is agreed and the price does not fit the work.

What's happening?

This is the second half of every variation argument, and often the more expensive half. The change is admitted, then the other side's quantity surveyor prices it at contract rates tendered for different conditions, or a pro-rata that ignores the disruption, while your dayworks records, the hour-by-hour cost of doing it, go unread. The number lands and you are told that is the mechanism.

But valuation is not a discretion, it is a hierarchy. The contract says when contract rates apply, when they must be adjusted, when new rates built for the changed work, called star rates, or a fair valuation take over, and when dayworks are the right measure. Which rung applies is an argument about the character and conditions of the work, fought with your own records: what changed, what it disturbed, what it actually cost.

The solution

Argue the right valuation basis, on your own figures.