Skip to content

Our enquiries go out inconsistent

Every ITT is assembled from the last one, and the gaps get priced against us.

01The enquiry assembled
02The price built up
03The returns compared
04The order placed
You are here: The enquiry is being assembled, from the last one again.

What's happening?

An enquiry copied from the last package carries the last package's assumptions: attendances that do not apply to this trade, a scope split that does not match these drawings, a pricing schedule each subcontractor quietly reformats into their own. Every recipient fills the gaps differently, and none of them fills a gap for free.

That is the real cost of an inconsistent enquiry: ambiguity always gets priced, as a covering allowance, as an exclusion, or as the variation argument that surfaces once the job is running and the order is already placed. And because each return answers a slightly different question, the levelling that follows starts a step behind before a single price is read.

The solution

The enquiry built properly, once per package.