Skip to content

What does the Price for Work Done to Date mean under NEC4 Options A and B?

Under Option A it is the total of the Prices for each completed group of activities and each completed activity not in a group; under Option B it is the quantity of work completed for each bill item multiplied by its rate, plus the completed proportion of each lump sum.

Updated: 15 September 2026. By Jack Butler-Kettle, Quantity Surveyor & Claims Consultant.

The answer

The Price for Work Done to Date is what the Contractor is paid for the work itself, and under the priced options its definition in clause 11.2 ties payment to the pricing document rather than to cost. Under Option A it is the total of the Prices for each group of completed activities and each completed activity not in a group. An activity is completed only when it is without Defects which would either delay or be covered by immediately following work, and there is no payment for an activity that is partly done, however nearly. That makes the activity schedule the cash flow document: large activities mean long gaps between payments, and an activity with a Defect in it is not paid at all until the Defect is corrected. Under Option B it is the quantity of work completed for each item in the Bill of Quantities multiplied by the rate for that item, plus a proportion of each lump sum which is the proportion of the work covered by the item that has been completed. Option B is remeasured, so the quantity paid is the quantity done, not the quantity billed. Under neither option are Plant and Materials delivered but not incorporated part of the Price for Work Done to Date unless the activity schedule or the bill provides for them, which surprises Contractors used to other forms. Implemented compensation events change the Prices, through the activity schedule under Option A and the bill under Option B, so an event that is not implemented does not reach the payment. What goes wrong: Option A applications that claim percentages of activities, or activities complete in the Contractor's view but carrying Defects; an activity schedule never updated for compensation events; Option B applications measured against bill quantities rather than site measurement; and lump sum proportions asserted without any basis.

Example

The situation

An Option A activity schedule has an activity for the substructure at £120,000 and one for the ground floor slab at £40,000. At the assessment date the substructure is almost finished but one pile cap remains to be cast.

What happens

  1. The Price for Work Done to Date for both activities is nil, because neither is completed.
  2. Had the Contractor split the substructure into four activities of £30,000 each, three complete ones would have earned £90,000.
  3. Under Option B the same work might be a bill item for excavation of 1,000 cubic metres at £30 per cubic metre, with 700 measured as done, earning £21,000.
  4. A £20,000 lump sum for site establishment, of which half the work is done, earns £10,000 under Option B.

The two Options in figures

ItemValueEarned
Option A substructure, one pile cap outstanding£120,000Nil
Option A ground floor slab, not completed£40,000Nil
Option A substructure split into four activities£30,000 each£90,000
Option B excavation, 700 of 1,000 cubic metres£30 per cubic metre£21,000
Option B site establishment, half done£20,000£10,000

The outcome

Under Option A the two activities earn nothing until each is complete, £90,000 had the substructure been split; under Option B the measured excavation earns £21,000 and the half-done establishment £10,000.

Under Option A only a completed activity earns, so how the activity schedule is split decides when the money arrives.